Minority Shareholders’ Rights under the Companies Act, 2013
- Aditi Srivastava

- Dec 12, 2025
- 4 min read

The Companies Act, 2013 brought a significant shift in corporate governance and shareholder protection in India. One of its central objectives is to strengthen the position of minority shareholders, those who hold less than controlling interest and are therefore more vulnerable to oppressive conduct by majority stakeholders. The Act introduces several statutory safeguards, remedies, and participatory rights to ensure that minority voices are not drowned by majority dominance. This article examines the key rights available to minority shareholders under the Companies Act, 2013, the mechanisms designed to protect them, and their practical significance in the corporate landscape.
Who Are Minority Shareholders?
Minority shareholders are individuals or groups who own fewer shares compared to majority shareholders and thus lack controlling power in the company. They typically have limited capacity to influence major corporate decisions such as mergers, elections of directors, or changes to the company’s constitution. As a result, they may face risks of oppression, mismanagement, or prejudicial actions by the majority. Recognizing these vulnerabilities, the Companies Act, 2013 incorporates robust provisions to ensure fair treatment, transparency, and meaningful participation.
Protection Against Oppression and Mismanagement (Sections 241–244)
The most significant protective mechanism for minority shareholders lies in Sections 241 and 242, which allow them to approach the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) when the company’s affairs are being conducted in a manner oppressive, prejudicial, or contrary to the interests of shareholders or the company.
Grounds for Relief
Minority shareholders can seek remedies if:
They are subjected to harsh or unfair treatment by the majority.
Corporate decisions are made in a manner prejudicial to their interests.
Management is being conducted in a fraudulent or unlawful manner.
There is mismanagement that could harm the company or its shareholders.
Who Can Apply?
Under Section 244, the Act prescribes thresholds:
Members holding at least 10% of issued share capital, or
At least 100 members, or
Members constituting 1/10th of the total number of members (in companies without share capital).
Importantly, NCLT has the power to waive these requirements, enabling even smaller minority groups to seek justice. This waiver provision has greatly strengthened minority protection by ensuring that procedural thresholds do not become barriers to substantive justice.
Powers of the Tribunal
The NCLT may order:
Regulation of the company’s affairs.
Removal of directors responsible for oppressive conduct.
Recovery of undue gains from directors.
Restriction on share transfers.
Requirement that majority shareholders buy out minority shareholders at a fair value.
Such broad remedial powers act as strong deterrents against oppressive practices.
Class Action Suits (Section 245)
The 2013 Act introduced class action suits, a landmark provision aimed at collective shareholder protection. Minority shareholders can file a class action suit against:
The company,
Its directors,
Auditors or audit firms,
Advisors or experts who have provided misleading statements.
When can a class action suit be filed?
Shareholders may initiate a class action when:
The management engages in fraudulent, illegal, or wrongful acts.
The company’s affairs are conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the company or its members.
They seek to restrain the company from fraudulent transactions, altering its MOA or AOA, or acting on misleading statements.
Class actions empower minority shareholders by enabling them to pool resources and fight collective grievances that they may not pursue individually.
Right to Information and Transparency
To ensure that minority shareholders can exercise informed oversight, the Act mandates various disclosure and reporting requirements.
Key information rights include:
Right to inspect registers of members, directors, and charges (Sections 88 and 92).
Right to receive financial statements, board reports, and auditor’s reports annually.
Right to demand circulation of resolutions (Section 111), if supported by a prescribed number of shareholders.
Right to participate and vote in general meetings either in person or through proxies.
Transparency reduces information asymmetry, enabling minority shareholders to detect mismanagement early and act appropriately.
Corporate Governance Safeguards
The Act improves governance standards to protect minority interests indirectly.
Independent Directors
Independent directors, mandated under Section 149, serve as objective voices in the boardroom. They are expected to:
Balance the interests of minority shareholders.
Monitor related-party transactions.
Prevent unethical or oppressive practices.
Audit Committees
Audit committees ensure oversight of financial reporting, whistle-blower complaints, and internal controls, reducing the risk of fraudulent activities that could harm minority shareholders.
Regulation of Related-Party Transactions (Section 188)
Related-party transactions (RPTs) often create avenues for majority shareholders or directors to siphon resources. The Act tightly regulates RPTs by:
Requiring board and shareholder approval for certain transactions.
Prohibiting related parties from voting on resolutions concerning their own interests.
Mandating disclosure of all RPTs in board reports.
This prevents abusive transactions that could prejudice minority shareholders.
Exit Options and Valuation Protections
Minority shareholders also benefit from valuation safeguards, particularly during:
Mergers and amalgamations (Sections 230–232),
Reduction of share capital,
Buy-back of shares,
Takeover offers in listed companies.
Fair valuation ensures minority shareholders are not forced to exit at unfair prices.
Conclusion
The Companies Act, 2013 represents a significant leap forward in strengthening the rights and protections of minority shareholders in India. Through provisions addressing oppression and mismanagement, class action suits, enhanced transparency, regulated related-party transactions, and improved governance structures, the Act ensures that minority interests are safeguarded against potential abuses of majority power. These rights not only empower minority shareholders but also promote accountability, fairness, and ethical standards that are essential for a robust corporate environment.
As Indian corporate activity continues to expand, the effective enforcement of these rights combined with increasing shareholder awareness will play a crucial role in fostering investor confidence and strengthening corporate democracy.




Comments